Re: Dreams and Visions Thread
Understood, Andy. But you admit that you haven't even attempted to understand it. It is therefore rather unfair for you to "scare away" (unintentionally, of course) others from attempting to understand the result. And I stand by my claim that the result is really "simple" mathematics -- no more complicated, at heart, than addition and counting, because that's all that is involved in it. I realize you don't want to try to understand it. That is your right, obviously. But I think it's unfair to others for you to characterize the result as "quite complicated" and requiring "numerical depth" -- doing so serves to "scare away" those who might otherwise attempt to understand what I found.
Understood, Andy. But you admit that you haven't even attempted to understand it. It is therefore rather unfair for you to "scare away" (unintentionally, of course) others from attempting to understand the result. And I stand by my claim that the result is really "simple" mathematics -- no more complicated, at heart, than addition and counting, because that's all that is involved in it. I realize you don't want to try to understand it. That is your right, obviously. But I think it's unfair to others for you to characterize the result as "quite complicated" and requiring "numerical depth" -- doing so serves to "scare away" those who might otherwise attempt to understand what I found.
Comment