Book recommendation - Judgment of the Nephilim - Ryan Pitterson

[Guest]

Hi Folks, has anyone read Ryan Pitterson

[Guest]

Somebody please tell me why my posts are cut in half and deleted?

[Guest]

I was saying....Ryan Pitterson

[Guest]

Gahhhh!

[Guest]

Clearly, I am not supposed to post here.

[Issachar]

PLEASE CONTINUE.

You are probably trying to post Pitterson*s, for example.

See? That posted.

Do not use apostrophes or quotation marks.

That means contractions need to be: don*t, doesn*t, etc. or just use do not, or does not.

Quotes: search copy and pastes for apostrophes and quotation marks. Use asterisks. *Like this.*

A pain, but works.

Copy your post before posting in case you miss something and have to repost, find offender and save, which is reposting.

Issachar

[Guest]

Thanks Issachar. It has been so long since I have posted anything worth reading that I have forgotten how to do it. But my spell checker likes to put apostrophes in for me. I will have to watch out for that.

What I was trying to say was that this book, the Judgement of the Nephilim is really good. It has confirmed many of my thoughts about the subject, as well as answered many of my lingering questions, and it is all biblically based and solid. He went into great depth to show how the Nephilim bloodline was carried through, on the ark, after the flood and infiltrated the land of Canaan.

[Guest]

MOO is that it looks better with nothing rather than using a *** instead of a '''''''''
Firefox browser may be friendlier to WEDG

[Issachar]

Lewis .. you were the first I saw after the software change, to use the asterisk in place of apostrophes and quotation marks. So I tried it too and it worked. So I have been doing that since.

Issachar

[Issachar]

I agree with most of all this sort of thing, but I have serious doubts (at this time) of the ark part .. re. post #7.

I agree with the *and after that* and Canaan and giants, but have doubts about the ark method of transmission.

In the discussion in this video, starting about 5:55 to the next couple minutes, this matter is mentioned.

Issachar

[Guest]

I have listened to him on a couple of videos, and now I have finished his book. And while I understand the doubts, I found it made some other things much more understandable - such as, why was Canaan cursed instead of his father, Ham, when Ham was the one who viewed Noah undressed in his tent? This question has puzzled me for years, and this makes the most sense to me. Also, as I read through my bible while I read this book, I was surprised to find that what he was suggesting was very clearly spelled out in scripture. There are only two assumptions he makes, and these are very clearly explained and plausible in light of who God is and how he works. Nothing is in the Bible by accident, but unless we read it with the proper light shone upon it, some things will never make sense. Once that light is turned on, it becomes crystal clear. Some very random passages are now understandable.

I highly recommend this book, as it deals with scripture first, and only uses outside sources after he makes his point (very little of the extra biblical texts, in fact), and backs up his view with historical commentary.

[Guest]

One interesting thing I learned is that there are three main giant killers - Moses, Joshua and David. All three are types of Christ. Moses is Yeshua who came to fulfill the law; Joshua is Christ who will claim his inheritance for his people; and David is Christ the King who will rule and reign over the promised land forever.