Announcement

Collapse

End of WeDG

Hi all,
Due to well over two years of a clear lack of interest in this board, I will be closing it when the hosting is up next month (24 Aug). I see no reason to continue this with the lack of readership and participation.

It's been a wonderful 27+ years, with tons of ups and downs, but with all the excellent resources available to us online via Telegram, YouTube and other platforms - we've outgrown our purpose. I do not believe any huge modification/improvements to the site would help, plus that has always been way beyond my knowledge/skill set.

Y'all know how to reach me.
See more
See less

UN vote on PA tate in: 138-9 in favour with 41 abstentions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: UN vote on PA tate in: 138-9 in favour with 41 abstentions

    Originally posted by SAT View Post
    Despite controversial abstention, Australia likely to remain loyal ally of Israel
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomac...emium-1.481621
    Merkel reaffirms support for Israel after UN vote
    http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPol...ID=294185&R=R1


    There almost seems to be a guilt thing going now???? Hopefully it can be used to Israel advantage for the next move.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: UN vote on PA tate in: 138-9 in favour with 41 abstentions

      Abbas gives victory speech in Ramallah: We have a state now

      http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=294294

      Here is a page I did on the covenant years ago showing the original document, etc.:

      http://vaulterjohn.tripod.com/covenant.html

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: UN vote on PA tate in: 138-9 in favour with 41 abstentions

        cnav, it has been too long since I made this page. Have not been following him since? If you know anything negative about him I will consider taking him off the site but it has been too long. Didn't find anything in a Google search?

        Sorry!

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: UN vote on PA tate in: 138-9 in favour with 41 abstentions

          Hi John,

          No nothing negative at all. I just wonderd if you knew him. I have referred to his site many times. I think he has done a good job re: the covenant.
          Last edited by cnav; 12-02-2012, 04:59 PM.

          Comment

          Working...
          X