Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    Originally posted by lewishb
    RevelationS". LOL
    well there is a whole lot of revelateing going on in
    revelation so i guess you could say its full of revelations
    I know and I hear it soooooooooooooooo much, even in prophecy videos sometimes.

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaargggggggggggggggggh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

    Leave a comment:


  • lewisb
    replied
    Re: Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    RevelationS". LOL
    well there is a whole lot of revelateing going on in
    revelation so i guess you could say its full of revelations

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    The only truism Biblically is that the planet does suffer because of the fall of man. The whole creation groans from us following after the error of Eve and Adam.

    Of course, all of us, male or female would have done the same thing.

    Only the Second Coming can fix that. And then another battle 1,000 years later? Yep, according to the Revelation of Jesus Christ to the Apostle John.

    Makes me cringe when it's quoted as "RevelationS". LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    Beer is not a natural substance. Show of hands please, how environmentalists are willing to give up beer for the good of the planet? Oops, I forgot. It takes money to buy beer and money is manmade, too. Let's call on these people to get rid of their money as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Re: Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    when one swallows environmentalism, one inescapably swallows poison

    ~ Dr. George Reisman
    Boy I don't agree with that at all. That's an incredibly bad statement and in error I might add, and in error Biblically to boot.



    Jacques-Yves Cousteau, environmentalist and documentary maker: "It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.
    Sieg Heil, Mein Fuhrer!!! How shall we do zat? Viss der Zyklon-B? Perhaps zee Fuhrer vud like uss to use zee gas chambers? Perhaps vee start viss de Joooooooooooos, no?

    Last edited by N1095A; 09-03-2005, 06:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Issachar
    replied
    Re: Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    Leave the planet? Die? I'm not sure what they mean. I wish they'd lead the way so I could see.

    Seriously, I am believing 100% that all of these folks are materialistic evolutionists (nothing exists except matter). If so, how can what man does to the planet be bad? How can it be good? It just is, isn't it? What we do to it is natural because natural is all that exists. If man is able to make something that pollutes, it's because that is how he evolved. How can that be right or wrong .... good or bad? sheeesshh .... it's not like a creature gets to choos how it will evolve.

    One thing that these sorts of environmentalists could do to lead the way to a more "natural" planet is to quit using cars, paper, ink, microphones, transmitters, anything plastic, etc., etc. .... if there are enough of them and they do that, then the planet would be much healthier. In fact, I'm willing to bet that at least a few of them make use of air conditioning! Of all the evil things ......

    There are those who say get rid of all the people on the planet and all will be well and there are those that say pollute away ... money and profit is all that matters. Both are wrong.

    Issachar

    Leave a comment:


  • lewisb
    started a topic Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    Cousteau: we must eliminate 350,000 people per day

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/englund/englund28.html
    The Mosquito: Environmentalism’s Weapon of Mass Destruction
    by Eric Englund
    by Eric Englund



    …when one swallows environmentalism, one inescapably swallows poison.

    ~ Dr. George Reisman

    Environmentalists want you dead; and the sooner the better. Did that get your attention? I certainly hope so. For it is the environmental movement’s objective to radically reduce the human population. As mankind seeks to extend the division of labor, to further explore for and utilize natural resources, to develop new life-improving technologies, and to enhance our quality of life, environmentalists view humanity as nothing more than a voracious parasite raping, pillaging, and sucking the life out of Mother Earth. It is within this context – i.e. rescuing Mother Earth from the human parasite, via massive population reduction – that one comes to understand the environmental movement’s nihilistic push to permanently ban the use of DDT always and everywhere. Ultimately, banning DDT (a safe and cost-effective insecticide) is tantamount to cheering on the mosquitoes to kill as many people as possible with such diseases as malaria, yellow fever, dengue fever, and West Nile virus.

    Of the aforementioned diseases, malaria causes the most deaths and illnesses worldwide. According to Malaria Foundation International (MFI):

    Malaria is responsible for about 500 million clinical cases of disease and about 2.7 million deaths a year, mostly those of children under five and pregnant women. In Sub-Saharan Africa alone, malaria destroys 70% more years of life than do all cancers in all developed countries combined. It therefore follows that even a tiny loss in the efficiency of a national malaria control program, occasioned by the loss of DDT or otherwise, would result in a tremendous number of additional deaths from the disease. (emphasis in the original)

    Yes, you read that correctly. That is 500 million acute illnesses per year resulting in as many as 2.7 million preventable deaths every year. More about these preventable deaths later (hint: the United States’ outright ban of DDT, in 1972, has had a hand in this large-scale death and misery).

    Speaking of bans, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) is pushing for a worldwide treaty aimed at permanently abolishing persistent organic pollutants (POPs) – of course greenies are fully backing this treaty. DDT, which is still manufactured and utilized in some parts of the globe, is on UNEP’s list of POPs. Organizations such as MFI, Africa Fighting Malaria (AFM), and the American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) are concerned about this ban as no safe and cost-effective replacement has been found for DDT. These groups argue that millions more will die needlessly if the POPs treaty is ratified and enforced.

    Members of the above-mentioned pro-DDT groups understand that environmentalists hold the moral high-ground on the emotional issue of DDT. Due to a massive disinformation effort, on the part of environmentalists (and parroted by the U.N.), most people mistakenly believe DDT is a highly carcinogenic/cancer-causing compound which is also devastating to wildlife. What members of MFI, AFM, ACSH and others have yet to come to grips with is that environmentalism’s most fundamental goal is to drastically reduce the human population. In other words, environmentalists want to permanently abolish DDT in order to bring about the deaths of as many people as possible. Hence, the pro-DDT groups’ pleas to save lives are falling upon deaf ears.

    To remove any doubt that greenies want you dead, let these environmentalists/monsters speak for themselves:

    Jacques-Yves Cousteau, environmentalist and documentary maker: "It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized, and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it. But the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable."

    John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal: "I suspect that eradicating smallpox was wrong. It played an important part in balancing ecosystems."

    Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University population biologist: "We’re at 6 billion people on the Earth, and that’s roughly three times what the planet should have. About 2 billion is optimal."

    David Foreman, founder of Earth First!: "Phasing out the human race will solve every problem on earth, social and environmental."

    David M. Graber, research biologist for the National Park Service: "It is cosmically unlikely that the developed world will choose to end its orgy of fossil-energy consumption, and the Third World its suicidal consumption of landscape. Until such time as Homo sapiens should decide to rejoin nature, some of us can only hope for the right virus to come along."

    Alexander King, founder of the Malthusian Club of Rome: "My own doubts came when DDT was introduced. In Guyana, within two years, it had almost eliminated malaria. So my chief quarrel with DDT, in hindsight, is that it has greatly added to the population problem."

    Merton Lambert, former spokesman for the Rockefeller Foundation: "The world has a cancer, and that cancer is man."

    John Muir, founder of the Sierra Club: "Honorable representatives of the great saurians of older creation, may you long enjoy your lilies and rushes, and be blessed now and then with a mouthful of terror-stricken man by way of a dainty!"

    Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund: "If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels."

    Maurice Strong, U.N. environmental leader: "Isn't the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn't it our responsibility to bring that about?"

    Ted Turner, CNN founder, UN supporter, and environmentalist: "A total population of 250–300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."

    Paul Watson, a founder of Greenpeace: "I got the impression that instead of going out to shoot birds, I should go out and shoot the kids who shoot birds."
    Obviously, pleading with environmentalists to save lives (by not banning DDT) would be no different than imploring Hitler to save Jews. How can anyone rationally negotiate with members of a movement bent on eradicating human beings? Part of the answer is for DDT supporters to go on the offensive and expose the green nihilists for what they are – anti-human cowards advocating the deaths of billions. Only through exposing such evil intentions can the humane pro-DDT organizations reclaim the moral high-ground and work toward saving millions of innocents.

    more at url
    Last edited by lewisb; 09-03-2005, 01:43 PM.
Working...
X