Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama "guarantees" West Bank withdrawal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama "guarantees" West Bank withdrawal

    http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=87860

    "With Obama, the number of settlers to be removed from the West Bank will much be more important than 60,000," said the PA official, referring to previous negotiations in which Israel expressed a willingness to withdraw from up to 94 percent of the West Bank and move about 60,000 settlers into central settlement blocks closer to Jerusalem.

    WND reported exclusively in November that then-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice collected notes and documents from Israeli and Palestinian negotiating teams to ensure the incoming U.S. administration would not need to start negotiations from scratch. PA sources said Rice's notes are being used by Obama's team as the starting points for new Israeli-Palestinian talks.

    Documents noting agreements during previous Israeli-Palestinian negotiations have been used in subsequent talks, sometimes as starting points. According to both Israeli and PA sources, American officials took detailed notes of talks at U.S.-brokered negotiations at Camp David in 2000 and then used points of agreement on key issues, such as borders, during recent rounds of intense Israeli-Palestinian talks.

    Israeli and PA sources said Rice's notes document agreements that would seek an eventual major West Bank withdrawal and would grant the PA permission to open official institutions in Jerusalem.

  • #2
    Re: Obama "guarantees" West Bank withdrawal

    This is NOT good....but Bush carries blame as well, from what I read in this article.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Obama "guarantees" West Bank withdrawal

      The depth of blindness is so baffling. How can ANYONE think that Israel withdrawing from ANYWHERE is going go cultivate peace.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Obama "guarantees" West Bank withdrawal

        So true, Andy!!
        What was logical is no longer logical, it seems.
        Who would've thought that the majority of the voters would have fallen head over heels for CHANGE without said proposed CHANGE having been defined???

        Comment

        Working...
        X